<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>swaits.com: Stewart vs. O'Reilly</title>
    <link>http://swaits.com/articles/2006/05/27/stewart-vs-oreilly</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>A Blog by Stephen Waits</description>
    <item>
      <title>Stewart vs. O'Reilly</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200605250003"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; over at &lt;a href="http://mediamatters.org"&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; has a few interesting points to make:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&amp;#8230; studies have shown that viewers of Comedy Central&amp;#8217;s The Daily Show with Jon Stewart are consistently better informed about current events than consumers of other media, and Daily Show viewers are considerably better educated than viewers of The O&amp;#8217;Reilly Factor. Further, consumers of Fox News in general have been found to be significantly more misinformed about current events than consumers of other mainstream media.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s good stuff.  I know a few highly educated people who gulp down everything O&amp;#8217;Reilly says like mid-westerners on meth.  Formal education doesn&amp;#8217;t translate to intelligence, or one&amp;#8217;s ability to see clearly.  Those political blinders are thick.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:07:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e8c1f484-3541-421a-abf7-3c968e2ba730</guid>
      <author>steve@waits.net (Stephen Waits)</author>
      <link>http://swaits.com/articles/2006/05/27/stewart-vs-oreilly</link>
      <category>tv</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://swaits.com/articles/trackback/254</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
