<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>swaits.com: Avionics Precision increases risk</title>
    <link>http://swaits.com/articles/2006/10/21/avionics-precision-increases-risk</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>A Blog by Stephen Waits</description>
    <item>
      <title>Avionics Precision increases risk</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Philip Greenspun has an interesting take on &lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2006/10/06/mid-air-collision-in-brazil-when-precision-kills/"&gt;modern day avionics precision increasing collision risk&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Almost any other system would be safer.  If you sent airplanes up to fly in random point-to-point paths, e.g., from Boston to Denver, they’d be less likely to encounter one another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do think the airway system may need revision.  With an increase in ATC and general computing capacity, there&amp;#8217;s little reason to keep an airway system.  Going direct, or near direct is somehow in our future.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Via &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.risks"&gt;comp.risks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:05:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9805a3a2-e216-4d9e-a88f-4c940e5ee6b5</guid>
      <author>steve@waits.net (Stephen Waits)</author>
      <link>http://swaits.com/articles/2006/10/21/avionics-precision-increases-risk</link>
      <category>aviation</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://swaits.com/articles/trackback/324</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
